A record
you can check.

FreeGaza.com supports Palestinian freedom, civilian safety and peaceful civic action. We condemn attacks on civilians and hostage-taking. We do not support violent organisations and do not collect donations directly.

We select records for their relevance to political responsibility, civilian protection and accountability. We identify exact quotations, paraphrases, allegations, judicial decisions and our own interpretation. We include relevant context, responses and policy changes even when they complicate our argument.

For statements, we prefer original recordings, official transcripts and contemporaneous posts. Where those have not been retrieved, we identify the document or reporting in which the statement is recorded. English translations are attributed to their source unless independently checked.

This archive covers a defined historical period. A historical sanction entry does not mean a designation remains in force today. A recorded warrant or interim order does not establish a conviction or a final judgment.

How this collection was selected

FreeGaza.com advocates Palestinian freedom and civilian protection. This is a selected collection reflecting that purpose, not an exhaustive or politically neutral survey. Selection includes policy changes, mediation and protective actions by governments criticised elsewhere in the archive.

References are labelled as leadership background or substantive records. They include contemporaneous mainstream reports, official decisions and individual testimony. Reference counts are not counts of independent investigations; several sources can concern the same event.

Positions and responses

In January 2024, Israel disputed genocidal intent and described its military campaign as self-defence, arguing that precautions and humanitarian measures demonstrated the absence of that intent. This is Israel’s submitted position, summarised in the Court’s order, not an adopted judicial conclusion. See S01 and S52. The US executive order states its objections to ICC jurisdiction and activity; that is the administration’s position. See S19.

Source provenance

This edition draws on official documents and attributable published reporting. Some material was located through indexed extracts; original recordings were not independently retrieved for every statement. Paraphrases are labelled. Linked sources have not all been downloaded into a preservation archive.

Research edition prepared 14 October 2026. Selected decision records cover October 2023–December 2025.

Corrections

Substantive changes to this archive are recorded below with their date and explanation.

Media accountability 14 October 2026

Added a Sean Bell / Sky News record concerning four-year-old Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin. Separated sourced reporting and quotation excerpts from editorial criticism, and identified the limits of recording verification.

International expansion 14 October 2026

Added seven country dossiers, three German statement records and nine dated decisions. Clarified the distinct evidentiary status of exports, votes, appeals, immunity positions and findings of non-cooperation.

Accountability gap collection 14 October 2026

Added twelve selected phases of reported harm, named decision-makers, available protective measures, documented response gaps and a UN vote ledger. Claims of refusal are limited to documented decisions; unknown incident-specific responses are marked as unestablished.

Statement archive expansion 14 October 2026

Added twelve UK and US statement records, distinguishing roles at the time, questions, direct excerpts and contextual summaries. The Starmer entry records the original 11 October 2023 exchange alone. Added country and speaker filtering.

Editorial revision 14 October 2026

Removed drafting instructions from public entries; completed the March 2024 court summary; added October 2025 ceasefire and mediation records; clarified selection and source categories; added access to opposing legal and government positions.